Tickmill vs Trading 212 2026
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill was founded in 2014, while Trading 212 dates back to 2004. Neither broker is publicly traded or a bank. Based on ForexBrokers.com’s Trust Score scale (where 80–89 is “trusted”), Tickmill scores 85 and Trading 212 scores 82—meaning both are considered trusted.
Looking at regulatory information, Tickmill holds 2 Tier-1 licenses (highly trusted) and 2 Tier-2 licenses (trusted). Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and 0 Tier-2 licenses. In short, Trading 212 has more top-tier authorizations, while Tickmill combines top- and mid-tier licensing; both meet trusted standards for safety and oversight.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
When it comes to commissions and fees, Tickmill has the edge over Trading 212 for active forex and CFD traders. Tickmill offers two account types: Classic, which is commission-free but has wider spreads, and Raw, which charges a $3 commission per side per standard lot and pairs that with tighter pricing. Even after the commission increase, Tickmill still delivers low overall trading costs, especially on its Raw account. It earns 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #10 out of 36 brokers for Commissions and Fees.
Trading 212 also promotes zero-commission trading on its CFD account, but that does not mean trading is free. Like most brokers, it still charges via the spread, and its published average EUR/USD spread of 2.7 pips for April 2025 is relatively high compared with stronger-priced competitors. Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #27 out of 36 brokers for Commissions and Fees.
In simple terms, Tickmill is usually the better choice if low trading costs matter most, especially for frequent traders who want tighter spreads and clearer all-in pricing. Trading 212 may appeal to beginners looking for a simple zero-commission message, but its wider spreads can make trading more expensive overall.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to range of investments, Trading 212 gives traders a much wider choice than Tickmill. Tickmill offers forex trading as a CFD or spot contract, along with 637 tradeable symbols and 62 forex pairs. It also supports copy trading and cryptocurrency CFDs, but it does not let clients buy actual shares on U.S. or international stock exchanges, or buy delivered cryptocurrency.
Trading 212 also offers forex trading as a CFD or spot contract, but its market coverage is far broader, with 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs. In addition, it lets clients buy real shares on both U.S. and international exchanges, buy actual cryptocurrency, and trade crypto CFDs. Reflecting this wider selection, Trading 212 is rated 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks #15 out of 36 brokers, while Tickmill is rated 3.5 stars and ranks #30 out of 36.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 62 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account, web-based platform access, and the option to place trades directly from a stock chart. Each broker is also rated 4 out of 5 stars for trading platforms and tools, so both offer a solid setup for everyday trading needs. However, Tickmill has a wider platform range overall, with a Windows desktop app, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and copy trading available, while Trading 212 does not support a desktop download, MT4, MT5, or copy trading.
For traders who want more platform choice and the familiar feel of MetaTrader, Tickmill has the edge. Trading 212 is simpler and still works well for web-based trading and chart-based order entry, but it is more limited in advanced platform options. In ForexBrokers.com’s Trading Platforms and Tools rankings, Trading 212 places higher at #19 out of 36 brokers, compared with Tickmill at #24.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, so either broker gives you access on the go. Each app also lets you sync watchlists between the mobile app and your online account, and both support drawing trendlines on charts. In ForexBrokers.com’s Mobile Trading Apps review, each broker earns 4 out of 5 stars, showing that both deliver a solid mobile trading experience.
There are a few clear differences to keep in mind. Trading 212 stands out with stock and forex price alerts, while Tickmill does not offer them. Trading 212 also provides more chart studies in its mobile app, with 104 compared to Tickmill’s 97, and it can auto-save chart drawings, which Tickmill cannot. Based on ForexBrokers.com rankings, Trading 212 places higher in the mobile category at #17 out of 36 brokers, while Tickmill ranks #25 out of 36.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | No | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
In a Tickmill vs Trading 212 market research comparison, Tickmill has the edge overall. It offers daily market commentary, research tools from Acuity Trading such as Signal Centre, and an economic calendar to track global events. Trading 212 does not provide daily commentary, but it does include news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, along with a sentiment tool that shows long and short positioning across markets. Neither broker offers research from Autochartist, Trading Central, or TipRanks.
For research quality, Tickmill is rated 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #19 out of 36 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #32. Both brokers include an economic calendar, but Tickmill stands out for its added commentary and third-party research tools, while Trading 212 is stronger for premium news coverage and market sentiment data.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When comparing Tickmill and Trading 212 for beginner education, both brokers give new traders a solid starting point. Each offers at least 10 beginner-focused videos, and both also provide at least 10 advanced videos for traders who want to keep learning as they gain experience. That said, Tickmill has a stronger edge in forex and CFD learning overall, with enough education content in that area and a more active schedule of online client webinars, offering them at least once a month. Trading 212 also covers forex and CFD learning, but it does not match Tickmill on live webinar support for beginners.
In terms of independent ratings, Tickmill scores higher for Education at 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #14 out of 36 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 holds a 3.5-star Education rating and ranks #20. For beginners looking for more guided learning and regular webinars, Tickmill appears to be the better choice, while Trading 212 still offers useful video-based education but with a slightly lighter overall learning setup.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Tickmill is better than Trading 212. Tickmill finished with an overall rank of #23, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Tickmill is a run-of-the-mill MetaTrader broker that offers a limited selection of tradeable securities. The broker does offer very competitive commission-based pricing for professionals through its VIP and Pro accounts.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill offers cryptocurrency trading only via CFDs (no ability to buy actual delivered coins), while Trading 212 supports both buying real cryptocurrencies and trading crypto CFDs.
Comparing online brokers Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill offers deposits and withdrawals via PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire but not ACH/SEPA (Visa/Mastercard not specified), while Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wire but not PayPal or Skrill (Visa/Mastercard not specified).
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 62 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | No | Yes |
| Research | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |