Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Moneta Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Founded in 2004, Trading 212 has built a solid reputation in the financial markets with a Trust Score of 79 out of 99 according to ForexBrokers.com, positioning it in the average risk category. As a non-bank and privately-owned firm, Trading 212 holds two Tier-1 licenses, which are highly regarded for their safety and reliability. On the other hand, Moneta Markets, established in 2009, has a marginally lower Trust Score of 72, placing it also in the average risk category. Similar to Trading 212, Moneta Markets is not publicly traded and operates independently of any banking institution. It holds one Tier-1 license and an additional Tier-2 license, which acknowledge its reliability.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Trading 212 and Moneta Markets are two compelling online broker choices, yet they differ in their commission structures and fees. Trading 212 offers a CFD account with a low minimum deposit of 10 euros, promising zero-commission trading. However, traders must account for spreads, which are generally higher than industry norms. For instance, the average spread on the EUR/USD pair was 1.9 pips in January 2024. Despite having a straightforward fee structure, Trading 212 receives a 4-star rating and ranks 43rd out of 62 brokers in the Commissions and Fees category by ForexBrokers.com.
Conversely, Moneta Markets provides a range of account types with varied fee structures to suit different trading needs. The commission-free Direct STP account offers an average spread of 1.38 pips on the EUR/USD pair, although this raises trading costs compared to other options. The Prime ECN account, with a $3 commission per side, has an all-in cost of around 0.79 pips, while the high-end Ultra ECN account offers the lowest commissions at $2 per round trip for deposits of $20,000 or more. With this flexibility, Moneta Markets earns a 4.5-star rating and is ranked 16th in the same category.
Overall, while Trading 212's zero-commission promise sounds appealing, Moneta Markets appears to offer more competitive pricing options, especially for those willing to meet higher deposit requirements. This broader choice in account types and slightly better spreads gives Moneta Markets an edge over Trading 212 for traders prioritizing cost efficiency.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €10 | $50 |
| Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 1.9 | 1.38 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.9 | 0.79 |
| Active Trader or VIP Discounts | No | No |
| ACH or SEPA Transfers | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 and Moneta Markets both offer a comprehensive range of investment options, but there are notable differences between the two. Trading 212 stands out with a vast selection of 8025 tradeable symbols, including 146 forex pairs. This platform also allows users to buy U.S. and international exchange-traded securities, such as Apple and Vodafone shares, enhancing its appeal to traditional stock investors. However, Trading 212 does not support copy trading, which Moneta Markets offers. Additionally, both platforms provide forex trading as CFDs and offer cryptocurrency derivatives, although they do not facilitate the purchase of actual cryptocurrencies.
Moneta Markets, while offering a respectable 1016 tradeable symbols and 54 forex pairs, focuses more on CFD trading, and unlike Trading 212, does not provide access to exchange-traded securities on U.S. or international exchanges. Despite this, Moneta Markets attracts those interested in copy trading. When it comes to rankings, Trading 212 receives a 5-star rating for its range of investments, placing it at #15 out of 62 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, whereas Moneta Markets earns 4 stars and is ranked #35. Overall, Trading 212 generally provides a wider array of investment opportunities, particularly for those interested in trading actual securities.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 8025 | 1016 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 54 |
| U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No |
| Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
When comparing Trading 212 and Moneta Markets, both brokers provide users with valuable trading platforms and tools, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. Trading 212 boasts a proprietary platform, accessible as a web-based application, offering a free virtual demo account for practice without financial risk. While it lacks desktop platform availability and popular platforms like MetaTrader 4 and 5, Trading 212 shines with features like trading directly from stock charts and 20 charting tools. It also provides ample customization with 5 columns for watch lists. Although Trading 212 doesn't support copy trading, its platform's user-friendly interface earns it a solid four-star rating for trading tools.
Moneta Markets stands out by incorporating widely used platforms like MetaTrader 4 and 5, along with unique features such as copy trading and ZuluTrade integration, making it appealing to those seeking diverse trading environments. While it lacks a proprietary platform, its offerings include a Windows-based desktop platform and web-based access. Traders can benefit from the 78 drawing tools available for charting and the ability to trade directly from charts, although it provides 4 columns for watch lists compared to Trading 212. Moneta Markets, like Trading 212, secures a four-star rating for its platforms and tools, though it ranks slightly lower at #33 versus Trading 212's #21. Both brokers present strong options, depending on whether you prefer in-house solutions or more globally recognized platforms.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| DupliTrade | No | No |
| ZuluTrade | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 105 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 20 | 78 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 5 | 4 |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
When comparing the mobile trading apps of Trading 212 and Moneta Markets, both platforms shine in accessibility, offering apps for both iPhone and Android users. Each platform provides essential features such as stock and forex price alerts and the ability to sync watchlists between mobile apps and online accounts, ensuring that traders can keep their portfolios up to date seamlessly. Additionally, users can draw trendlines and explore various time frames like daily or intraday on stock and forex charts, with auto-save functionality preserving their work. This makes for a smooth and efficient trading experience, whether you're on the go or at your desk.
However, a notable difference lies in the technical studies offered by each app. Trading 212 significantly outshines Moneta Markets by providing 104 technical studies for charting compared to Moneta Market's 30. Hence, traders seeking more detailed analysis may prefer Trading 212's mobile app. Despite both apps earning a commendable 4-star rating for their mobile trading platforms, Trading 212 holds a stronger ranking at #17 among 62 brokers according to ForexBrokers.com, while Moneta Markets is ranked at #35. This may reflect Trading 212's slightly more appealing offering to those prioritizing comprehensive charting tools.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlist Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When it comes to market research tools and features, Trading 212 and Moneta Markets each offer distinct advantages. Moneta Markets provides daily market commentary that is not available through Trading 212, making it a better choice for traders who appreciate daily updates. Both platforms deliver forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg and Reuters. While Trading 212 has a sentiment-based trading tool to gauge the ratio of long and short positions, Moneta Markets steps up with additional support from Trading Central, enhancing its technical analysis capabilities.
Traders will also find that both Trading 212 and Moneta Markets offer an economic calendar to track global news events. However, neither broker integrates with Autochartist, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading's Signal Centre for further analysis, which might influence more research-driven traders. Overall, when considering research quality, Moneta Markets earns a slightly higher rating of 4 stars compared to Trading 212's 3.5 stars. Furthermore, Moneta Markets ranks #32 in the research category among 62 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, outperforming Trading 212, which holds the #46 spot.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central (Recognia) | No | Yes |
| Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Signal Centre (Acuity Trading) | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When comparing the educational resources for beginners offered by Trading 212 and Moneta Markets, both platforms provide a solid foundation. Trading 212 and Moneta Markets each offer a collection of over 10 educational pieces focused on forex and CFDs, ensuring that new traders have ample materials to start with. Both brokers also have a comprehensive selection of beginner-friendly videos, covering fundamental trading topics to help newcomers grasp essential concepts. However, Trading 212 goes a step further by offering monthly educational webinars and maintains an archive of these sessions which users can search for previous content. Additionally, Trading 212 provides an investor dictionary with over 50 terms defined, a resource that is absent from Moneta Markets.
Despite offering fewer features, Moneta Markets slightly edges out Trading 212 in terms of educational rating, receiving 4 stars compared to Trading 212's 3.5 stars. This may indicate a higher user satisfaction with the educational quality from Moneta Markets. However, in the Education category ranking by ForexBrokers.com, Trading 212 holds the 20th spot out of 62 brokers, while Moneta Markets ranks 33rd. This suggests that while both platforms offer valuable educational resources, Trading 212 might be more recognized for its comprehensive offerings to traders seeking a more guided educational experience.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Client Webinars | Yes | No |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 62 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than Moneta Markets. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while Moneta Markets finished with an overall rank of #35.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Moneta Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 79 | 72 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platform & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Both Trading 212 and Moneta Markets do not provide the option to buy actual delivered cryptocurrencies but do offer the ability to trade cryptocurrency derivatives.
When comparing Trading 212 and Moneta Markets for deposit and withdrawal options, Trading 212 stands out by offering ACH and SEPA transfers as well as PayPal, alongside Visa/Mastercard and bank wires, whereas Moneta Markets provides Visa/Mastercard and bank wire options but lacks support for ACH, SEPA, PayPal, and Skrill, with both platforms not offering Skrill.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platform & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 79 | 72 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Moneta Markets Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Platforms Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Research Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Education Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 79 | 72 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA/Central Bank Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | No | No |
| Investments | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 8025 | 1016 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 54 | |
| U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No | |
| Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No | |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 1.9 | 1.38 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.9 | 0.79 | |
| Active Trader or VIP Discounts | No | No | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Execution: Agency Broker | Yes | No | |
| Execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €10 | $50 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| ACH or SEPA Transfers | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No | |
| DupliTrade | No | No | |
| ZuluTrade | No | Yes |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 5 | 4 | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 105 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 20 | 78 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlist Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central (Recognia) | No | Yes | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Client Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/JPY | Yes | Yes | |
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CAD | Yes | Yes | |
| NZD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| AUD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Moneta Markets Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platform & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 79 | 72 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Moneta Markets Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill